Financial Performance Assessment of Bank Syariah Indonesia Using The Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings And Capital Approach (2020–2024)
DOI:
10.46729/ijstm.v7i5.1460Published:
2026-09-10Downloads
Abstract
Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI), as the largest Islamic bank in Indonesia, must maintain its soundness level to perform its intermediation function optimally. This study aims to analyze the financial performance of BSI for the period 2020–2024 using the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) approach. This research employs a quantitative descriptive method utilizing secondary data derived from BSI's Annual Reports for the 2020–2024 period. The analysis is conducted by calculating the Non-Performing Financing (NPF) and Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) for the Risk Profile aspect; self-assessment results for Good Corporate Governance (GCG); Return on Assets (ROA), Operational Expenses to Operational Income (BOPO), and Net Operating Margin (NOM) for the Earnings aspect; as well as the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) for the Capital aspect. The results indicate that the Risk Profile aspect is categorized as Healthy to Very Healthy, with NPF ranging from 1.76% to 3.02% and FDR from 73.39% to 84.97%. The GCG aspect consistently achieved Composite Rank 2 (Good). Regarding Earnings, ROA increased from 1.29% to 2.27%, BOPO decreased from 84.61% to 69.94%, and NOM rose from 1.30% to 2.15%, reflecting improved profitability and operational efficiency. Meanwhile, the CAR ratio remained between 18.24% and 22.09%, falling under the Very Healthy category. Based on the evaluation of all RGEC components, Bank Syariah Indonesia achieved Composite Rank 1 (PK-1) with a Very Healthy rating throughout 2020–2024, demonstrating its capacity to manage risks, implement good corporate governance, enhance profitability, and maintain capital adequacy.
References
[1] Al-Rahbi, H., Al-Sleimi, M., & Al-Kiyumi, A. (2022). Financial performance determinants of Islamic banks: Evidence from GCC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(8), 1182–1199.
[2} Ascarya. (2021). Analisis ekonomi dan keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Bank Indonesia.
[3] Bank Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 9/12/PBI/2007 tentang Penerapan Good Corporate Governance bagi Bank Umum. Bank Indonesia.
[4] Bank Indonesia. (2011). Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP perihal Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Bank Indonesia.
[5] Bank Indonesia. (2012). Standar penilaian tingkat kesehatan bank dan kodifikasi peraturan terkait. Bank Indonesia.
[6] Bank Syariah Indonesia. (2024). Laporan keuangan tahunan 2020–2024. PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk. https://www.bankbsi.co.id/
[7] Dendawijaya, L. (2009). Manajemen perbankan. Ghalia Indonesia.
[8] Financial Services Authority. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 4/POJK.03/2016 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
[9] Financial Services Authority. (2020). Statistik perbankan syariah Indonesia 2020–2024. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
[10] Financial Services Authority. (2022). Laporan perkembangan keuangan syariah Indonesia. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
[11] Harmono. (2017). Manajemen keuangan berbasis balanced scorecard. Bumi Aksara.
[12] Kasmir. (2014). Manajemen perbankan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
[13] Rivai, V., & Arifin, A. (2010). Islamic banking: Sebuah teori, konsep, dan aplikasi. Bumi Aksara.
[14] Sutedi, A. (2011). Good corporate governance. Sinar Grafika.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Science, Technology & Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
